Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Smith v. Golden Peanut Company, LLC
as 1:2014cv00999
Plaintiff:
James Edward Smith
Defendant:
Golden Peanut Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Jones et al
as 7:2014cv00918
Petitioner:
James Edward Wallace
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, McCall and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Elmore Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
James Edward Patterson
Defendant:
Elmore Correctional Facility, Draper Correctional Facility, Bruce Lafogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagley v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00435
Petitioner:
James Edward Bagley
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Bettinna Carter and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
James Edward Spencer
Respondent:
Robert Bentley, Bob Riley, Don Siegelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brand v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00940
Plaintiff:
James Edward Brand
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers and Shawn Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2012cv03675
Petitioner:
James Edward Schultz
Respondent:
State of Alabama , Carter, Circuit Court of Cullman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
