Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 71
MILES v. NADOLSKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00601
Plaintiff: JAMES EDWARD MILES
Defendant: PATRICK NADOLSKI and PAUL SOBERBURG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough v. USA
as 5:2013cv00792
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Edward McCullough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Coombs v. Lewis et al
as 5:2013ct03183
Plaintiff: James Edward Coombs
Defendant: Nurse Lewis, Nurse Anthony, Nurse Geddie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roseboro v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00410
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Edward Roseboro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Weeks v. Elks et al
as 5:2013ct03149
Plaintiff: James Edward Weeks
Defendant: Neil Elks, Major Phillips, J. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milbourne v. USA
as 5:2013cv00285
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Edward Milbourne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Speller v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2013hc02058
Petitioner: James Edward Speller, II
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WA SALAAM v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00962
Plaintiff: SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WA SALAAM
Defendant: SHEP JONES, DAVID NEWTON, JAMES EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00817
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
CUTHRELL v. USA
as 1:2012cv00659
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JAMES EDWARD CUTHRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?