Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GILLETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41632
Plaintiff:
JAMES GILLETT
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suny Victor v. James Gillette, et al
as 17-3131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNY VICTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GILLETTE, JOHN NEMASTIL, TIM MCKENNA and others
Gillette v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00175
Petitioner:
James Gillette
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Suny Victor v. James Gillette, et al
as 15-3584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNY VICTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GILLETTE, JOHN NEMASTIL, TIM MCKENNA and others
John Andrews, et al v. James Flaiz, et al
as 14-4288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MARK ANDREWS and JUDEE ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES R. FLAIZ, DAVID JOYCE, NICHOLAS BURLING and others
Victor v. Gillette et al
as 1:2014cv02731
Plaintiff:
Suny Victor
Defendant:
James Gillette , John Nemastil , Tim McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillette v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv00127
Petitioner:
James Gillette
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Andrews et al v. Flaiz et al
as 1:2014cv00623
Plaintiff:
John Mark Andrews and Judee Andrews
Defendant:
James R Flaiz, David Joyce, Nicholas Burling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillett v. Everest Asset Management, LLC
as 0:2013mc62280
Plaintiff:
James Gillett
Defendant:
Everest Asset Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
In re: PA Child Care, LLC, et al
as 12-4452
Petitioner:
In re: PA CHILD CARE LLC, WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CHILD CARE, LLC and MID ATLANTIC YOUTH SERVICES CORPORATION
Respondent:
FLORENCE WILLIAM, et al., SAMANTHA HUMANIK, CINDY LEHAN and others
Defendant - Respondent:
WILLIAM CONWAY, et al.
Nominal Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
