Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sanford v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
James Lewis Sanford
Respondent:
United States of America and Quinton Miller
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanford v. Brown et al
as 5:2021ct03015
Defendant:
Case Manager Hicks, R. Wiggins, Nurse Boon and others
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Sanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Benjamine
as 5:2018ct03017
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Sanford
Defendant:
S. Benjamine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. USA
as 3:2016cv00559
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Lewis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanford v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2013ct03138
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Sanford
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Marshall Pike, Lt. Lawrance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Branker
as 1:2009cv00416
Petitioner:
James Lewis Morgan
Respondent:
Gerald Branker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Thomas et al
as 5:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Montez Desmond Jackson
Defendant:
James Lewis Thomas and Barbara Jean Thomas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanford v. Rivera et al
as 5:2008ct03108
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Sanford
Defendant:
Raymond Rivera and Michael Ledford
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes, James Anderson-Bey, Eric Evans-El and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Cumberland County District Attorney, Cumberland County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanford v. Wake County Public Safety Center
as 5:2008ct03054
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Sanford
Defendant:
Wake County Public Safety Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
