Cases 1 - 10 of 22
ELLIOTT v. THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2018cv08504
Plaintiff:
TARIQ ELLIOTT
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, ROBERT WALL, BASHITI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2017cv02889
Plaintiff:
AARON GLOVER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and JAMES PLOUSIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIRTHWRIGHT v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv00617
Plaintiff:
GAVIN BIRTHWRIGHT
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and JAMES PLOUSIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIRTHWRIGHT v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv00617
Plaintiff:
GAVIN BIRTHWRIGHT
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and JAMES PLOUSIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALBERTO v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2016cv09397
Petitioner:
RUBEN H. ALBERTO
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, JAMES PLOUSIS, BRANDON ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
HOLMES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2016cv01434
Plaintiff:
WILFRED LEE HOLMES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, DAVID W. THOMAS, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOCASCIO v. LONGINETTI et al
as 2:2016cv00566
Plaintiff:
GENO A LOCASCIO
Defendant:
SHARON LONGINETTI, STEVEN TISCHIO, CHRISTOPHER CARLINI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAADHIO v. GETER et al
as 3:2015cv08809
Plaintiff:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant:
CHARLES GETER, SAMUEL T. FRISBY, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2015cv07186
Plaintiff:
GEORGE C. RILEY
Defendant:
N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD, JAMES PLOUSIS, EDWARD JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
