Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cheshire v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04087
Plaintiff:
James Raymond Cheshire
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Ortho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Niblock v. Mike Pearce
as 15-50074
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES RAYMOND NIBLOCK
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE PEARCE, Warden FCI Bastrop
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00746
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-41269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Raymond v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
James Raymond
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Collier et al v. BP American Production Company et al
as 2:2012cv00347
Plaintiff:
Reed Collier , Glenn Nelson , Michael Beech and others
Defendant:
BP American Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Danos & Curole Staffing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
James Niblock v. Claude Maye
as 11-50903
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES RAYMOND NIBLOCK
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution Bastrop, Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00399
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
512:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Niblock v. Maye
as 1:2010cv00539
Respondent:
Warden Claude Maye
Petitioner:
James Raymond Niblock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
