Cases 1 - 10 of 10
APEXCO PPSI, LLC et al v. HERDT et al
as 2:2019cv05989
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAYMOND, APEXCO PPSI, LLC, HAMBURG, RUBIN, MULLIN, MAXWELL & LUPIN, PC and others
Defendant:
FRIEDA VAN OSTA and WILLEM DE HERDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BORCHERT v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00741
Petitioner:
JAMES RAYMOND BORCHERT
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUTLER COUNTY and WILLIAM H. RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zwick v. Holt
as 1:2011cv00629
Petitioner:
James Raymond Zwick
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ZWICK v. U.S.A.
as 2:2010cv01449
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAYMOND ZWICK
Defendant:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY v. LOGAN et al
as 2:2010cv05254
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY
Defendant:
BRUCE WAYNE LOGAN, SAMUEL LEE LOGAN, JAMES RAYMOND LOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. FLINTKOTE et al
as 2:2010cv79894
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. ALLEN , ROBERT E. ALLEN, JR. and JAMES RAYMOND ALLEN
Defendant:
FLINTKOTE, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv03000
Plaintiff:
MARCIA DAVIS and THE ESTATE OF JAMES RAYMOND CALLEN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHOEMAKER, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86592
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAYMOND SHOEMAKER
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KRESS et al v. HEISEY et al
as 2:2007cv03588
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAYMOND KRESS, ELIZABETH ANN PAICEK, ROBIN ALANNA GREGORY and others
Defendant:
DAWN HEISEY, STAN HEISEY, SUSAN DAWBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
