Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Raynor v. Maldonado
as 26-2966
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAYNOR and JAMES MITCHELL
Defendant:
Lt. MATTHEW MCLAUGHLIN, in his individual capacity and MALDONADO, Warden, in her individual capacity
James Raynor v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 5:2026cv01618
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAYNOR
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Raynor v. Trumell et al
as 3:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
James Raynor
Defendant:
Rickett, Devost, Trumell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor et al v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv01221
Defendant:
McGaunclin and Maldonado
Plaintiff:
James Raynor and James Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv01038
Defendant:
Jamie Gendron, McGaunllin, Eileen Law and others
Plaintiff:
James Raynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Paul James Raynor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Raynor v. Washington et al
as 3:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
James Raynor
Defendant:
Washington, Lugo, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Raynor v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
James Raynor
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, State Agency Judicial Marshal Services, Rollin Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00772
Plaintiff:
Patterson, Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
