Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 4.31 Acres of Land, Owned by James T. Chandler and Kathy E. Chandler et al
as 7:2019cv00679
Defendant:
4.31 Acres of Land, Owned by James T. Chandler and Kathy E. Chandler
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Orus Berkley v. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
as 18-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORUS ASHBY BERKLEY, JAMES T. CHANDLER, KATHY E. CHANDLER and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN E. CISEK, MARTIN CISEK, EDITH FERN ECHOLS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION and NEIL CHATTERJEE, in his official capacity as Acting Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Giles County, Craig County, Montgomery County, Roanoke County, Franklin County, and Pittsylvania County, Vir et al
as 7:2017cv00492
Defendant:
1.97 Acres of Land, Owned by Keith M. Wilson and Mary K. Wilson, 3.76 Acres of Land, Owned by Catherine Beckner Kingery, 2.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Howard M. Thompson and Christine W. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Tammy Belinsky and Daniel Breslau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Chandler et al v. Starcraft RV, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
James T. Chandler, James T. Chandler, James T. Chandler and others
Defendant:
Starcraft RV, Inc., Bechtel National Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Chandler et al v. Starcraft RV, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00792
Plaintiff:
James T. Chandler, Tina M. Lachney, S. D. L. and others
Defendant:
Starcraft RV, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
