Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Dyson v. Ratliffe-Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jamie Wayne Dyson
Defendant:
Warden Dana Ratliffe-Walker, Keith Kelly and Mrs. S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. En Pointe Productions LLC, et al
as 1:2022cv00287
Defendant:
Carrie A Groenwold, Deviant Entertainment, LLC, Gorgon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gailen Lee David
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Khoraki v. Longoria, et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jad Khoraki
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Derrick Longoria, Jamie Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
United Specialty Insurance Company v. 88 Freight LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
88 Freight LLC, Jamie McCann, Samuel A. Buttari, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Raiford v. Clarke et al
as 1:2021cv00734
Defendant:
M Foster, Russ, Jamie and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Raiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Gerber Products Company
as 1:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jamie Moore
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buttari et al v. Everette et al
as 3:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Buttari, Sr. and Jamie McCann
Defendant:
Michael Everette, 88 Freight, LLC and M and C Transfer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
