Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Ashford v. Jumper et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Shawn Jumper and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
J.C. Bryant, III
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Pulaski County Dentention Center, Pulaski County Dentention Center Medical Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Regan v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03886
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Regan
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Joshua Schoenbeck, C/O Lauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv03261
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
Transunion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Mead et al
as 1:2023cv05656
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
Steven Mead, John Doe, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Chaplain Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04151
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
TransUnion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Greene et al
as 3:2023cv03017
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross
Defendant:
. Greene, . Ashcraft, Serena Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
