Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nailcare Academy LLC et al v. Medinails, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Nailcare Academy LLC and Janet McCormick
Defendant:
Medinails, Inc and Dr. Robert Spalding
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Nailcare Academy LLC et al v. Medinails, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Janet McCormick and Nailcare Academy LLC
Defendant:
Medinails, Inc and Robert Spalding
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Spalding et al v. McCormick
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Robert Spalding and Medinails
Defendant:
Janet McCormick
Counter_claimant:
Janet McCormick
Counter_defendant:
Robert Spalding
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
McCormick et al v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2012cv01389
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McCormick and Janet McCormick
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCCORMICK v. ASTRUE et al
as 2:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
JANET MCCORMICK
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCormick et al v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2011cv01097
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McCormick and Janet McCormick
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCCORMICK v. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv87388
Plaintiff:
JANET MCCORMICK
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, A.C. & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LONGOBARDI et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv87387
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LONGOBARDI, JANET MCCORMICK, FLORENCE MORRIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, A.C. & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCORMICK v. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv67949
Plaintiff:
JANET MCCORMICK
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, AC & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
