Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Martin v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Janice Martin
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center, East Baton Rouge, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Janice Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Gautreaux
as 21-30025
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Probation and Parole, Louisiana State Police Department, Thomas Eskola and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glenn Damond
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Edward Peterson, Correcthealth and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damond v. State of LA
as 20-30684
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle R. Shelton, City of Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glenn Damond
Damond v. Martin et al
as 3:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Edward Peterson, Correcthealth and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damond v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2020cv00550
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, East Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office, Thomas Eskola and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spears v. Martin et al
as 3:2020cv00438
Defendant:
State Of Louisiana, James Winston, Sid J. Gautreaux, III and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damond v. State Of Louisiana et al
as 3:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Thomas Eskola, State Of Louisiana and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
