Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22188
Plaintiff:
JASON ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Robertson v. USA
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jason Robertson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robertson v. Just In Time Cargo, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jason Robertson
Defendant:
Just In Time Cargo, Inc. and Steven Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67227
Plaintiff:
JASON ROBERTSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01564
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JASON ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03158
Plaintiff:
RYAN SIMPSON, NICKLAUS NAPIER, JOHN CIFUNI and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boyer et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02134
Plaintiff:
Ryan Simpson, Nicklaus Napier, John Cifuni and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Robertson v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01043
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jason Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
