Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CANO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv03821
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER CANO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09414
Plaintiff:
JAVIER CANO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cano et al v. Alice Dry Cleaners Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv06461
Defendant:
Dong Hyun Park, Alice Dry Cleaners Corp. doing business as Alice Dry Cleaners, Yngwen Kang and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Cano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morales Benito et al v. Anassa Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2020cv10114
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Morales Benito and Javier Cano
Defendant:
Victor Flores, Anassa Holdings LLC doing business as Anassa Taverna and Nick Tsoulos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Cano et al v. American Mortgage Express Financial et al
as 2:2010cv00777
Plaintiff:
Javier Cano and Puataunofo Matagi
Defendant:
American Mortgage Express Financial, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, James H. Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christina Campos, et al v. Nueces County, Texas, et al
as 10-40117
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHRISTINA CAMPOS, as Representative of the Estate of Roberto Roland Garcia and ANGELITA SOLIS TORRES
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO CAVAZOS, III, CONRAD GUZMAN, DONALD HATCH and others
Botero et al v. Carmona et al
as 0:2008cv61633
Plaintiff:
Willy Mayenberger Botero, Francisco Piquero Villegas, Jairo Sallnas Camacho and others
Defendant:
American Express Tax and Business Services, Inc. and American Express Tax and Business Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
