Cases
Driever v. Reeb, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff: Jeanette Driever
Defendant: Jody Carey and David P. Reeb, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeanette Driever v. USA, et al
as 21-5125
Defendant / Appellee: Jody Upton, Warden, in his official and individual capacity, Attorney General of the United States, All FBOP Directors of Psychology Services-Nationwide and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jeanette Driever, All similarly situated federal female inmates
DRIEVER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01807
Defendant: DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ALL FBOP DIRECTORS OF PSYCHOLOGY SERVICES-NATIONWIDE, UNKNOWN PRISON EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff: JEANETTE DRIEVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little et al v. United States of America et al
as 7:2017cv00009
Plaintiff: Rhonda Fleming, Charlsa Suzanne Little and Jeanette Driever
Defendant: Barack Hussein Obama, Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driever v. Upton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00003
Petitioner: Jeanette Driever
Respondent: Jody R. Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
State of Texas, et al. v. United States of America, et al. Featured Case
as 7:2016cv00054
Plaintiff: State of Texas, State of Kentucky, State of Tennessee and others
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Education, United States Department of Justice and others
Amicus Curiae: Governor C. L. "Butch" Otter, State of Washington, Letitia James, Public Advocate for the City of New York and others
Petitioner: Dr. Rachel Jona Tudor, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Charlsa Suzanne Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?