Cases 31 - 40 of 40
YOUNG-BEY v. ELDER et al
as 1:2009mc00617
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY
Defendant:
ESTER D. ELDER, WILLIAM T. MASSEY and MASSEY-KENNEDY ASSOC., INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Young-Bey v. Elder et al
as 1:2009cv02299
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
Esther D. Elder, William T. Massey and Massey-Kennedy Assoc., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. State of Maryland
as 09-6806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden, KAREN RAIMONDO, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02722
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. John Rowley
as 08-6693
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden, STATE OF MARYLAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Young-Bey v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2007cv02179
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01137
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YOUNG-BEY V MANSPEAKER
as 02-1126
Plaintiff-Appellant:
JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY, JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY, JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY and others
Defendant-Appellee:
LIEUTENANT T.0. MANSPEAKER, UNITED STATES, LIEUTENANT T.0. MANSPEAKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
