Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SMITH v. STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. SMITH
Defendant:
STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. , JOHN D. LAPEY , MICHAEL P. HALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parshall v. Park Sterling Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Park Sterling Corporation, Leslie M. Baker, Jr., Walter C. Ayers, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Finney v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Finney
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. BERMAN
as 1:2014mc00047
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
JEFFREY S. BERMAN
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. B & D Adventure, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Sony/ATV Songs LLC , Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Defendant:
B & D Adventure, LLC and Jeffrey S. Boles
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
PNC Bank, National Association v. At-Net Holding, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00324
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
At-Net Holding, LLC , At-Net Services-Charlotte, Inc. , At-Net Services-Greenville, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY S. WATSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cerkoney v. Hudgins
as 5:2008cv00123
Defendant:
FNU Hudgins
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Cerkoney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cerkoney v. Mann et al
as 5:2008ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Cerkoney
Defendant:
Charles L. Mann, Sr. and Mary Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
