Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Burger #201715 v. Stieve et al
as 2:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
George G. Burger #201715
Defendant:
Jeffrey Stieve, Jesus Nuri, Rae Ann Brand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Bobbie Maxwell v. Correctional Medical Services,, et al
as 12-1644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBIE A. MAXWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., also named as "Prison Health Service, Inc.", KEITH IVENS and others
Hall v. Holmes et al
as 2:2012cv10316
Plaintiff:
Steven Hall
Defendant:
Scott Holmes, Ernest Chrisian Gauderer, Jeffrey Stieve and others
Burton v. Parks et al
as 2:2011cv14768
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Burton
Defendant:
J Parks, Tiffany H Cannefax, John R. Kearney and others
Rueben Herrerra, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUEBEN HERRERRA and RICO MENEFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
Rueben Herrerra, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUEBEN HERRERRA and RICO MENEFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
Leonza Tipton v. Prison Health Services, Inc., et al
as 11-1093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONZA TIPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., et al., JEFFREY STIEVE, et al. and SAMIR PARIKH, MD
Clifton Moffat v. MDOC, et al, et al
as 10-2351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON PAUL MOFFAT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ADAM EDELMAN and others
Nathaniel Porter v. Haresh Pandy, et al
as 10-2182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARESH B. PANDY, JEFFREY STIEVE, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director and others
Naturalite v. Forner et al
as 4:2010cv13564
Plaintiff:
Jami Naturalite
Defendant:
Gregory Forner, Robin J. Gilbert, Larry Ford and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
