Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Jensen v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JENSEN and ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW
Defendant:
DAVID SHINN, Director and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections, in their official capacities
Other:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jane Wang v. City of Cupertino, et al
as 23-16090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE WANG
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CUPERTINO and PHILLIP WILLKOMM
Defendant:
JOYCE FUNG, GREG LARSON, ALBERT SALVADOR and others
Adrienne Jensen v. United States Tennis Association
as 23-15799
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADRIENNE JENSEN
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION
Adrienne Jensen v. United States Tennis Association
as 23-15757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIENNE JENSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION
Patrice Brown, et al v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-15141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICE E. BROWN, OLIVER MICHAEL PRYOR, MAJOR T. KINNEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, AMANDA M. PARKER, B. NOELLE JENSEN and others
Dean Manes v. Raymond Kaecker, et al
as 22-56225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAN MANES
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND KAECKER, AU SPORTS AND GRAPHICS, KRISTEN WELCH, individual: official capacity and others
Kent Williams v. Fox, et al
as 22-36014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT GLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
FOX, Guard, HILLNER, Ada County Jail Guard, 4199, BROOKS, Guard and others
Corazon De Cristo Cano, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-56094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORAZON DE CRISTO CANO, TERRY HARDIN, CRYSTAL IRVIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
