Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Parshall v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, et al
as 3:2017cv00035
Defendant:
Robin Abrams, Brian Beattie, Darin G Billerbeck and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jensen v. Premo
as 6:2016cv02049
Petitioner:
Joel Jensen
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tilahun v. Gower et al
as 6:2016cv00070
Defendant:
Gower, Michael F. Gower, Jana Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Tilahun and Shua Tilahun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Peters et al
as 2:2015cv01782
Defendant:
Alves, N. Berry, Christian and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Lee Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jensen et al v. Columbia Collection Service Inc.
as 3:2015cv01605
Defendant:
Columbia Collection Service Inc.
Plaintiff:
Emily Jensen and Evan Jensen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jensen v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00930
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Debra S. Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bigbee v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
Kyle Maurice Bigbee
Defendant:
Deputy D. Boone, Mary Brown, Clackamas County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CR et al v. Three Rivers School District
as 3:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
C.R., S.G. and T.L.
Defendant:
Dare Jensen and Three Rivers School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nickel v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv01924
Defendant:
An Unknown No. Of John Does & Jane Does, C. Coffey, R.N., Dr. Degner and others
Plaintiff:
Brian S. Nickel
ODOC:
Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
