Cases 1 - 10 of 502
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nettles v. State of Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2024cv02241
Plaintiff:
Doris Ann Nettles
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Government, Melanie Taylor Jefferson d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee, Joedae L. Jenkins d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Terrance Arnold, II
Defendant:
Jeremy Cox and Lexington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ray Davis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Jon Walton and Frank Strata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jeremy Sims
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
