Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Swartz v. Kim, et al.
as 26-3726
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Respondent:
SALLIE KIM, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, WILLIAM ALSUP, DISTRICT JUDGE and UNKNOWN PARTY, Commanding Officer, Elmwood Correctional
Swartz v. USA
as 3:2026cv04709
Petitioner:
Jesse Franklin Swartz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SWARTZ v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2025cv04440
Plaintiff:
JESSE F. SWARTZ, V
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS and JAMES C. DUFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Swartz
as 25-6643
Defendant:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Swartz v. Kim et al
as 3:2025cv07911
Petitioner:
Jesse F. Swartz
Respondent:
Judge Sallie Kim and Judge William Alsup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swartz v. Rosen et al
as 5:2025mc80239
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Swartz
Defendant:
Jeff Rosen, John Imobersteg and Katherine R. Carey
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Swartz v. All Article III Judges for the Northern District of California
as 25-4636
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Respondent:
ALL ARTICLE III JUDGES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Swartz v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 25-3907
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(PS) Swartz v. State of California
as 2:2025cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Swartz
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin Newsom and Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Swartz v. Alsup, et al.
as 25-1566
Plaintiff:
JESSE F. SWARTZ
Defendant:
WILLIAM ALSUP, DISTRICT JUDGE, JAMES THOMSON and MARISSA HARRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
