Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Valle Diaz v. Blanche
as 26-2760
Petitioner:
ANGEL JESUS VALLE DIAZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 25-6460
Plaintiff:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, RICARDO ARIAS, RAMIREZ and others
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 25-202
Defendant:
JESUS VALLE, URBANO VEJIGA, DANIEL MARTINEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Martinez v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 24-7619
Real Party In Interest:
PONCE, MARGARITO CASTILLO MEDINA, RAMIREZ and others
Petitioner:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
John Bright v. City of Santa Maria et al
as 2:2022cv08344
Plaintiff:
John Bright
Defendant:
City of Santa Maria, Chief Phil Hansen, Sgt. Jesus Valle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adolfo Valle Villalobos v. Jeffrey Rosen
as 21-70035
Petitioner:
ADOLFO JESUS VALLE VILLALOBOS
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General
Jesus Valle et al v. Regency Villas Condominium Association et al
as 8:2020cv02029
Plaintiff:
K. V., A. V., A. R. V. and others
Defendant:
Regency Villas Condominium Association, Team Property Management, Inc. and Regency Villas Condominium Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
De Jesus Valle v. Target Corporation
as 1:2019cv24450
Plaintiff:
Diznarda De Jesus Valle
Defendant:
Target Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jesus Valle v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:18-CV-04463
Plaintiff:
Jesus Valle
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
