Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00589
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00773
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ibrahim v. Vizio Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00462
Plaintiff: Jibril L. Ibrahim
Defendant: Vizio Corporation, Self Storage Plus, Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Jibril Ibrahim
as 21-1183
In Re: In re: Jibril L. Ibrahim
In re: Jibril Ibrahim
as 12-7124
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Jibril L. Ibrahim
:
Jibril Ibrahim v. Mid-Atlantic Air of DC, LLC
as 11-7150
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jibril L. Ibrahim
Defendant - Appellee: Mid-Atlantic Air of DC, LLC
IBRAHIM v. MID-ATLANTIC AIR OF DC, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01070
Plaintiff: JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM
Defendant: MID-ATLANTIC AIR OF DC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jibril Ibrahim v. Lathan & Watkins, et al
as 09-7048
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jibril L. Ibrahim
Defendant - Appellee: Lathan & Watkins, Law Office, Irwin Goldbloom and Curtis P. Lu, Esq. America on Line
IBRAHIM v. LATHAN & WATKINS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00732
Petitioner: JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM
Defendant: LATHAN & WATKINS, IRWIN GOLDBLOOM and CURTIS P. LU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Jibril Ibrahim v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-5052
Petitioner - Appellant: Jibril L. Ibrahim, also known as Grant Anderson
Respondent - Appellee: United States of America, Attorney General of the United States and Helen Marberry, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?