Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jimmy Mamoth v. Management Training Corp., et al
as 16-17164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY MAMOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, PAMELA RIDER, Warden, Kingman Hualapai Unit (KHU), HECTOR SANTIAGO, Deputy Warden of Operations, Kingman Complex and others
Mamoth v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv03803
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Mamoth
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation , Pamela Rider , Hector Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mamoth et al v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv02917
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Mamoth, Adam Mills, Clay Faccio and others
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation , Pamela Rider , Hector Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jimmy Mamoth v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50899
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY JAMES MAMOTH, also known as Jimmy Mamoth, also known as Jimmy J. Mamoth
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Mamoth v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01267
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Mamoth
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mamoth v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01251
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Mamoth
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claxton et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01142
Plaintiff:
Richard William Claxton, Ronald Dale Birdwell, Jimmy Mamoth and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claxton et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Richard William Claxton, Ronald Dale Birdwell, Jimmy Mamoth and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
