Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bao Zhang et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 5:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Bao Zhang, Jing Feng and Qianxi Feng
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bao Zhang et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
BAO ZHANG, JING FENG and QIANXI FENG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lin v. Demetro
as 1:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Jing Feng Lin
Defendant:
Michael Demetro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv08135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Jing Feng, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70666
Petitioner:
XIAOTAO SUN and JING FENG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Knaus et al v. The Boeing Company
as 4:2015cv03916
Plaintiff:
She Lee, Jianjia Yang, Yirui Wang and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Petitioner:
Asiana Airlines Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Knaus et al v. The Boeing Company
as ILN/1:14-cv-00839
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The
Plaintiff:
Carl Knaus , Maricel Anino Knaus , Nini Shao and others
Knaus et al v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2014cv00839
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The
Plaintiff:
Carl Knaus , Maricel Anino Knaus , Nini Shao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Xiao v. Holder
as 13-705
Petitioner:
Jing-Feng Xiao
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Jing Dong v. Atty Gen USA
as 10-1329
Petitioner:
JING FENG DONG, AKA Hai Li
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
