Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aboites et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Cherilyn Aboites, Lois Allen, Carol Alsay and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
THOMAS et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv03276
Plaintiff:
JINKS THOMAS and ARANA HAYWARDO THOMAS
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Stetser v. Sherry Jinks, et al
as 13-4053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID STETSER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY JINKS, Individ. & in her official capacity as a Police Officer in the Gloucester Township Police Department, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
JINKS et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES
as 2:2010cv69485
Plaintiff:
CONNIE R JINKS
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STETSER v. JINKS et al
as 1:2010cv03094
Plaintiff:
DAVID STETSER
Defendant:
SHERRY JINKS, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JINKS v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv05092
Plaintiff:
DAVID JINKS and DAVID JINKS
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
