Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JK Moving & Storage, Inc. v. The Advance Group et al
as 1:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
JK Moving & Storage, Inc. d/b/a JK Moving Services
Defendant:
The Advance Group and Bryan Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. JK MOVING & STORAGE, INC.
as 1:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Winmar Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
JK Moving & Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JK Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Winmar Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
JK Moving & Storage, Inc.
Defendant:
Winmar Construction, Inc. and Edwin Carlos Villegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WINMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. JK MOVING & STORAGE, INC.
as 1:2017cv02164
Plaintiff:
WINMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
JK MOVING & STORAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JK Moving & Storage, Inc. v. J & K Moving LLC
as 1:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
JK Moving & Storage, Inc.
Defendant:
J & K Moving LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Grimmage v. JK Moving & Storage Inc et al
as 4:2016cv03685
Plaintiff:
Vincent Grimmage
Defendant:
JK Moving & Storage Inc and Vicente Ascencio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. JK MOVING & STORAGE, INC.
as 1:2015cv01847
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TAYLOR
Defendant:
JK MOVING & STORAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JK Moving & Storage, Inc. v. JK Moving Systems, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00599
Plaintiff:
JK Moving & Storage, Inc.
Defendant:
JK Moving Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
BRODY v. JK MOVING & STORAGE INC et al
as 1:2009cv01588
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. BRODY
Defendant:
JK MOVING & STORAGE INC, CHARLES SANFORD KUHN, DAVID HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
