Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Piercy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Jody Piercy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sena et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Manuel J. Sena, Jr. and Jodi Sena
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Layne v. Thouroughman et al
as 1:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
James W. Layne, IV
Defendant:
David Thouroughman, Ron Davis, Jodi Conkle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Williams v. McGilton et al
as 4:2023cv01950
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Jared McGilton, Jodi Starr, James Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ustorf v. Reliance Standard LIfe Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jodi Ustorf
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hurst v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2023cv01722
Plaintiff:
Jodie Marie Hurst
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Robinson v. Butler et al
as 3:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Defendant:
Ohio State Patrol Lonnie Butler, V. Brown Legal Services, OH Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODR&C) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Elliott v. Forshey
as 4:2023cv01320
Petitioner:
Jody A. Elliott
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
