Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chaucer Corporate Capital (No. 2) Limited (UK)-CCC2L et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv04296
Defendant:
Rugby Realty, LLG operating under the assumed name Vapetricity, LG Chem America, Inc, Opaque Vape LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chaucer Corporate Capital (No. 2) Limited (UK) - CCC2L and Chaucer Corporate Capital (No. 3) Limited (UK) - CCC3L
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv03231
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John W. Jones and Village of San Jose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Abdul-Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yuwsuf Abdul-Ghafoor, Rhoda Kathleen Blair, Linda Cohill and others
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Jones v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv03627
Plaintiff:
John Adams Jones
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Sergio Herrera, Sergio Simental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv11310
Plaintiff:
John W Jones
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
U.S. Freightways Logistics, Inc. v. HT Bar, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02299
Plaintiff:
U.S. Freightways Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
HT Bar, Inc. and John R Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv03208
Plaintiff:
John E. Jones
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Supt. Thompson, C/O Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banterra Bank v Jones et al
as 3:2013cv01275
Plaintiff:
Banterra Bank
Defendant:
John Breck Jones, Sue S Jones, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Sykes v. Alfon et al
as 3:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eddie J Sykes
Defendant:
David Alfon, Linda Runge, Daniel L Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
