Cases
Fox v. Daniel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00044
Plaintiff: Robert James Fox
Defendant: Reece Daniel, The State of Texas, County of Cherokee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAZAR v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01527
Plaintiff: MILTON KAZAR
Defendant: CITY OF CAMDEN, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. University of Kansas Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02530
Plaintiff: Diane E. Perkins
Defendant: University of Kansas Medical Center, University of Kansas Board of Regents, University of Kansas Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOODWIN v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF MORRIS et al
as 2:2010cv04965
Plaintiff: RICKY L GOODWIN
Defendant: BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF MORRIS, MORRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MORRIS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOVINS v. CANNON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv05354
Plaintiff: CHARLES NOVINS, ESQ.
Defendant: KEVIN A. CANNON, KEVIN MICHAEL FRIES, JIM KELSO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Torts - Injury Both
WHITE v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04802
Plaintiff: DASHAUN WHITE
Defendant: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MOUNTAINVIEW YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, LARRY GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRICE v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2008cv00501
Plaintiff: CLINTON PRICE
Defendant: CITY OF PATERSON, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, THE PROSECUTOR OF THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?