Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MJ's Market, Inc. v. Jushi Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv40037
Plaintiff:
MJ's Market, Inc.
Defendant:
Jushi Holdings, Inc., Jushi MA, Inc., Jushi, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
USA v. Omowaiye
as 21-50696
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Stephen Omowaiye, also known as Steven Rivers, also known as David Canoa, also known as Kevin Shaw, also known as Kevin Sap, also known as John Brady, also known as George Mitchell, also known as Joshua Meex, also known as Stephen Omo, also known as
Collins Asset Group, LLC v. Diversified Financing, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00942
Defendant:
VENETIA LAPPAS, FEI HAVENOR, GREGORY TINDALL and others
Plaintiff:
Collins Asset Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Industrial Tower and Wireless, LLC v. Sepulcha et al
as 1:2017cv11199
Plaintiff:
Industrial Tower and Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Robert Sepulcha, John Brady, Stuart Freeland and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Jay Dees Inc. v. Defense Technology Systems Inc
as 12-3612
Plaintiff:
Harry Catton, Phillip Marks, Stephen Kevelson and others
Defendant:
Defense Technology Systems Inc., Edward McPhee, Daniel McPhee and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
John Brady
Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Todtman, Nachamie, Spizz & Johns, P.C.
Jay Dees Inc. v. Defense Technology Systems Inc
as 12-3576
Plaintiff:
Harry Catton, Phillip Marks, Stephen Kevelson and others
Appellant:
Todtman, Nachamie, Spizz & Johns, P.C.
Defendant:
Defense Technology Systems Inc., Edward McPhee, Daniel McPhee and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John Brady
Artemis IV, LLC v. Organic Bouquet, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv03528
Plaintiff:
Artemis IV, LLC, Artemis IV, LLC, Artemis IV, LLC and others
Defendant:
Organic Bouquet, Inc., Organic Style, Ltd., Gerald Prolman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
