Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00285
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
DENNY v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv10078
Plaintiff:
JOHN DENNY
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Baillie v. Thompson et al
as 6:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
John Dennis Baillie
Defendant:
Captain Kenneth Thompson and Head Nurse Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Daryl Alan Scott, Lee Allen Mayhew and John Dennis Baillie
Defendant:
Noel Brown, Captain Kenneth Thompson, Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08299
Plaintiff:
JOHN DENNY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: John Chapman
as 15-14456
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN DENNIS CHAPMAN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Baillie v. Johnson
as 6:2015cv00099
Petitioner:
John Dennis Baillie
Respondent:
Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: John Chapman
as 14-15109
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN DENNIS CHAPMAN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Chapman v. USA
as 14-13242
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DENNIS CHAPMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
