Cases 41 - 50 of 241
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. CONTEE et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA CHARITY WHITE
Defendant:
ROBERT J. CONTEE, III, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
AHMED v. GABLE et al
as 1:2021cv03333
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD MOKHTAR AHMED
Defendant:
CHARLES H. GABLE, IV, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, DAVID M. BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FUENTES v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv03106
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS FUENTES
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KASAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02693
Plaintiff:
HELEN KASAY and HELEN A. KASAY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JAMES WALKER, INEZ SAKI-TAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORMLY v. WALKER et al
as 1:2021cv02688
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GORMLY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INEZ SAKI-TAY, JAMES WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. NEWSHAM et al
as 1:2021cv02415
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
PETER NEWSHAM, PHILIP ROBINSON, ROBERT GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAHONEY v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv02314
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H. GIBSON, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
