Cases 81 - 90 of 119
Pease v. Hyde et al
as 3:2013cv03003
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Pease
Defendant:
Brenda Hyde, Danny Kaemingk, Tanya Reiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ehlers v. City of Rapid City et al
as 5:2012cv05093
Plaintiff:
Randall Ehlers
Defendant:
City of Rapid City , Scott Dirkes , Matt McCroden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Doe et al
as 4:2012cv04207
Plaintiff:
Earnest Bell
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kozlowski et al v. Palmquist et al
as 4:2012cv04174
Plaintiff:
James Kozlowski and Perry Kozlowski
Defendant:
Gregory J. Palmquist, North American National Marketing, LLC, NANM, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Carter v. Jackley et al
as 4:2012cv04129
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Marty Jackley, Doug Barthel, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04084
Plaintiff:
Lynette K. Johnson
Defendant:
Douglas Weber , Troy Ponto , Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stormo v. City of Sioux Falls et al
as 4:2012cv04057
Plaintiff:
Eric Stormo
Defendant:
City of Sioux Falls , R. Shawn Tornow , Dave Munson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Kroupa v. 4-H et al
as 4:2012cv04046
Plaintiff:
Greg Kroupa
Defendant:
4-H , Peter A. Nielsen , Rod Geppert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldsmith v. Dooley et al
as 4:2011cv04181
Plaintiff:
Charles Kyle Goldsmith
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Jennifer Stanwick, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNL Technology Development Corporation et al v. Christensen
as 4:2011cv04120
Plaintiff:
UNL Technology Development Corporation and Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
Defendant:
Chris Christensen and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
