Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Guzman Mendez v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv00381
Petitioner:
Lucio Arturo Guzman Mendez
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Department of, Matthew Ablence, John Asmussen and others
Respondent:
Chad Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cooks v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2019cv00340
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Kim Reynolds, Alan Ostergren and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jose Cooks
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Dubuque, City of et al
as 2:2019cv01020
Defendant:
David Randall, Wendy Lyons, Kelly Francois and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weems v. Officer John Doe et al
as 4:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and City of Muscatine
Interested Party:
Muscatine County Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Weems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. City of Burlington, Iowa et al
as 4:2019cv00186
Plaintiff:
Dale Dexter Morrow, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe and City of Burlington, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. McCarthy et al
as 4:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Robert Stanton, U.S. Probation Office, Michael John Daly and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naholi v. Reade et al
as 1:2019cv00037
Defendant:
Robert Phelps, CJ Williams, Richard L Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Oscar Naholi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lindsay v. Francis et al
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
John Doe, Stephanie Schmidt, Jane Does 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Miles Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heiden v. Boffeil et al
as 3:2018cv03068
Defendant:
Jana Hacker, Jane Doe, Dr David Richter and others
Plaintiff:
Robert D Heiden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heiden v. Boffeil et al
as 4:2018cv00455
Defendant:
Jana Hacker, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert D Heiden
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
