Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 3:2013cv00467
Petitioner:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Respondent:
Rick Ryan Pegram , Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 4:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Defendant:
Rick Ryan Pegram, Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 5:2012cv00750
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Defendant:
Rick Ryan Pegram, Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Estes Express Lines, Inc. v. Carpenter Decorating Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
Estes Express Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
Carpenter Decorating Company, Inc., Doe Corporations 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Estes Express Lines, Inc. v. Pyramid Cement Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00265
Plaintiff:
Estes Express Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
Pyramid Cement Products, Inc., Doe Corporation 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
HOPPE, et al v. GREAT WESTERN BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2009mc00011
Plaintiff:
LINDA HOPPE and JERRY BROWN
Defendant:
GREAT WESTERN BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
ESTES EXPRESS LINES INC. v. PALMETTO ALUMINUM, LLC, et al
as 1:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES INC.
Defendant:
PALMETTO ALUMINUM, LLC, DOE CORPORATION 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. CAROLINA VIRGINIA SPRAY BOOTH, INC.
as 1:2008cv00726
Plaintiff:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES
Defendant:
CAROLINA VIRGINIA SPRAY BOOTH, INC., DOE CORPORATION 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
