Cases 1 - 8 of 8
YAH'TORAH v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
ZION'ELIYAH YAH'TORAH
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, LORIE L. OTT, GET IT DONE SOLUTIONS LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBSON v. FREEMAN
as 1:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III
Defendant:
CHRIS FREEMAN, CAPTAIN SHANE BULLINS, SHERIFF SAM SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCIACCA et al v. THE DURHAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2020cv00094
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. SCIACCA, SR., KIMBERLEY SCIACCA and ANDREW J SCIACCA, JR.
Defendant:
RENEE PRICE, JOHN DOE 2, DR. PASCAL MUBENGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOLLUM et al v. PETERKIN et al
as 1:2017cv00965
Plaintiff:
WADDELL MCCOLLUM and LENA MCCOLLUM
Defendant:
HUBERT PETERKIN, TIMOTHY RUGG, SAMUEL MORANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS, ET AL. V. STEIN, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS , NC RSOL , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, ERIK HOOKS, ANDY WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , ROSANELL EATON , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
PATRICK LLOYD MCCRORY, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH , JOSHUA B. HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CALDWELL v. DEATON et al
as 1:2010cv00223
Plaintiff:
EMMETT W. CALDWELL
Defendant:
CHRISTY DEATON, RACHEL EMERSON, DEBBIE BATCHELOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
