Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Terrizzi v. ALOFT HOTEL MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv11434
Plaintiff:
Linda Terrizzi
Defendant:
ALOFT HOTEL MANAGEMENT, INC., Aloft Lounge, LLC, Aloft, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomes v. Boston Medical Center et al
as 4:2021cv40061
Defendant:
Boston Medical Center, John Doe, 1 and John Doe, 2
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gomes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pena v. Cacioppo et al
as 1:2021cv10984
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Sergio Cacioppo, Officer McGurn and others
Plaintiff:
Wilson Pena, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bassett v Blitt
as 1:2021cv10899
Defendant:
Cameron Rose doing business as Colton Grey, John Doe #14 doing business as Magdeline St. Michaels, Vivid Canada Entertainment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Sanchez v. Mici et al
as 1:2021cv10021
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conley v. Brian et al
as 1:2020cv12196
Plaintiff:
Taryn Conley
Defendant:
Steven W Tompkins, Lisa Enos, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Silva v. Bennett et al
as 1:2020cv11866
Defendant:
Michael Gomes, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2020cv11825
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Michael Gomes, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Aaron v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2020cv11604
Defendant:
John Doe, Board of Inquiry Internal Investigation, City of Lowell and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rodrigues et al v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2020cv11455
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rodrigues and Maria Rodrigues
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc., John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
