Cases 71 - 80 of 335
Ettienne Modeste v. Hillsborough County Sheriff Dpt. et al
as 1:2021cv21017
Plaintiff:
Dexter Ettienne Modeste, Jr.
Defendant:
Falkenburg County Jail, Hillsborough County Sheriff Dpt., John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. LEAVINS et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
MAXIE, JOHN DOE #20, BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN NUNOZ and JONATHAN NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONOVAN et al v. Doe I et al
as 1:2021cv20499
Plaintiff:
CHINEDU ERNESTO, CORTEZ NATHAN, BLAKE RATCLIFF and others
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 7, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lighthouse Transportation Services, LLC. v. US Melon, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv20225
Defendant:
US Melon, LLC, John Doe #1, Ken Kodish and others
Plaintiff:
Lighthouse Transportation Services, LLC. and Joe Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Davis v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2021cv14021
Plaintiff:
De Javar C. Davis
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Scott et al
as 0:2020cv62656
Defendant:
School Board of Broward County, Frank Hepler, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DOE 1 et al
as 4:2020cv00579
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Bey v. Pooler et al
as 1:2020cv24967
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Judge Teresa Pooler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustine v. Snyder et al
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant:
FNU Snyder, FNU Ashley, FNU Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Augustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
