Cases 71 - 80 of 93
EARLE v. RICHETT et al
as 1:2012cv00522
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEE EARLE
Defendant:
RICHETT, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballew v. Gloucester Engineering Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00164
Plaintiff:
Alice G. Ballew
Defendant:
Gloucester Engineering Co., Inc. , HBK Industries, Inc. , Peerless-Winsmith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. Bailey et al
as 3:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Mungo Bey
Defendant:
Chip Bailey, Ellen Gravitt, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Regan v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Marjory Wagner Regan
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, William Feeley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 5:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
Patrick Collins, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-39, et al
as 5:2011cv00381
Plaintiff:
K-Beech, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-22
as 5:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
K-Beech, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hinton v. Lopez et al
as 3:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Linda Lopez, Andrew Murray, Christian Hoel and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
OWEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2010cv00837
Plaintiff:
BARRY THOMAS OWEN, JR.
Defendant:
TERRY S JOHNSON , B. J. BARNES , JOHN DOE (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lorillard Tobacco Company, et al v. Wilson Wholesale & Distributors, et al
as 5:2010cv00480
Plaintiff:
Lorillard Tobacco Company and Lorillard Licensing Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Wilson Wholesale & Distributors , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
