Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Fornix Holdings LLC et al v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Fornix Holdings LLC and CP Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Unknown Party Named as John Doe #1 doing business as pornez.net, Unknown Party Named as John Doe #2 doing business as cumgloryhole.com and Unknown Party Named as John Doe #3 doing business as hqcollect.net
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Fornix Holdings LLC et al v. Unknow Party et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Fornix Holdings LLC and CP Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Unknow Party named as John Doe #1 doing business as Justswallows.com, Unknown Party named as John Doe #2 doing business as xgloryhole.com, VeriSign Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Fornix Holdings LLC et al v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv01942
Plaintiff:
Fornix Holdings LLC and CP Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Unknown Party named as John Doe #1 doing business as DaftSex.com, Unknown Party named as John Doe #2 doing business as PornWild.com, EasyDNS Technologies Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Townsel v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv00371
Plaintiff:
Curtis Townsel
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Jane Doe, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sears v. Todd et al
as 2:2009cv00577
Plaintiff:
Alvalee Sears, III
Defendant:
Todd, Hernandez, Rodarte and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tillmon v. Maricopa County et al
as 2:2007cv00746
Plaintiff:
Richard L Tillmon
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Joseph M. Arpaio, Maricopa County Supervisors, Board of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
