Cases 41 - 50 of 63
BRUCE v. DOE et al
as 2:2018cv00526
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN DOE #1
Plaintiff:
JASON KENNETH BRUCE
Interested Party:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00985
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Department of Corrections and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Jason Kenneth Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Griffin et al
as 3:2018cv00630
Defendant:
John Perry, Brad Rogers, Kathy Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun L Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CISLO v. BANDY et al
as 1:2018cv02510
Defendant:
CRAIG CRAIGE, JOHN DOE #1, DALE BANDY and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE B. CISLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. WEXFORD HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv01327
Plaintiff:
EARLIE BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
BARNS DOE, BRAD DOE, COLLINS DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. THE MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2018cv01002
Defendant:
BULLER, CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS /MARION COUNTY, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
LAURENCE PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MARRE et al
as 1:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
THEODORE A. DAVIS, II
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grothjan v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jason Grothjan
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Mitchiff et al
as 3:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
David R Neal
Defendant:
Michael Mitchiff, Dr Bartles, John Doe 1 and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRITT v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2016cv03125
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. PRITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
