Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Beach v. Ogemaw, County of et al
as 2:2014cv13463
Plaintiff:
June Beach
Defendant:
Ogemaw, County of , Howie S. Hanft , John Doe 1 sherrif dept employee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14356
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1 , JOHN DOE 2 , JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Highland Park, City of et al
as 2:2013cv13745
Plaintiff:
Ronald C Jones
Defendant:
Highland Park, City of, Eric Hollaway, Carnecki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
v. Anderson et al
as 2:2013cv12629
Defendant:
Det. Police Officer Anderson, Det. Police Officer John Doe #1, Det. Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Graham v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2012cv14491
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Graham
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Ralph Godbee, John Doe and others
El Ssayed v. Western Michigan University et al
as 1:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Hatem El Ssayed
Defendant:
Western Michigan University , Muhamed Sultan , Carla Koretsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauss v. A-1 Bail Bond Agency, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv12533
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bauss
Defendant:
A-1 Bail Bond Agency, Inc., Matthew Maddock, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McPhail v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2012cv12134
Plaintiff:
Julie McPhail
Defendant:
Macomb, County of , Macomb County Sheriff's Department , Anthony Wickersham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Dissette et al
as 1:2011cv01260
Plaintiff:
Maureen Jordan
Defendant:
Brian Dissette , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2011cv14274
Defendant:
Wayne, County of , John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Julan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
