Cases 11 - 20 of 32
NUNEZ v. LEAVINS et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
MAXIE, JOHN DOE #20, BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN NUNOZ and JONATHAN NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustine v. Snyder et al
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant:
FNU Snyder, FNU Ashley, FNU Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Augustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00214
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 19, JOHN DOE 21, BRIAN LEACH and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derive Power, LLC v. Masudur Rahman et al
as 6:2020cv00697
Defendant:
Masudur Rahman, John Doe 7, John Doe 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Derive Power, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Ives v. Reddish et al
as 3:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Thompson, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Ives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. INCH et al
as 3:2019cv02068
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, RICHARDSON, JOHN DOE #0 and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS LEE BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOUIS DEL FAVERO ORCHIDS INC v. RIVKEES et al
as 4:2019cv00284
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, Christian Bax, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Del Favero Orchids, Inc. and LOUIS DEL FAVERO ORCHIDS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Borroto v. Lees et al
as 6:2019cv00851
Defendant:
John Doe 9, Peter Crank, Lees Eid and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Armas Borroto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01433
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hodge and Estate of Allison Blackwell
Defendant:
Teva Branded Pharmaceuticals Products R&D, Inc., John Doe #1 Through John Doe #10 and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pandolfi v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv01600
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceuticals Products R&D, Inc. and John Doe #1 through John Doe #10
Plaintiff:
Amy Pandolfi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
