Cases 21 - 30 of 17,360
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Buczek v. Seterus, LLC
as 24-1143
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH A. BUCZEK
Defendant:
SETERUS, LLC, sometimes also assuming the alias of PHH Mortgage, JOHN DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants, JANE DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants and others
John Doe v. Priscilla A. Madrid et al
as 8:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Priscilla A. Madrid, Thomas Vasquez, William Earl Baker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Velasquez v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01569
Plaintiff:
Kim Velasquez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Barton v. Walmart Inc., et al.
as 24-2649
Plaintiff:
NATHEN W. BARTON
Defendant:
WALMART INC., JOHN DOE, 1-10 and SHOUJING ZHOU
Reyes v. Yager Esthetics Estetica et al
as 1:2024cv03206
Plaintiff:
Yandy Reyes
Defendant:
YAGER ESTHETICS ESTETICA, JEFFREY S. YAGER, NEWBEAUTY and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ruotolo v. Town of New Paltz
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
ANGELO RUOTOLO
Defendant:
Sherrif JUAN FIGUEROA, JOHN DOE, ULSTER COUNTY and others
Matamoros v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Marlon Matamoros
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fulmer v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Susan Fulmer
Defendant:
John Doe and Michelle I. Zatizabal
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gibson v. Grant
as 24-1086
Plaintiff:
DONALD GIBSON
Defendant:
Police Officer TERIQ C. GRANT, Shield No. 12175, Detective RYAN OLSEN, Shield #5992 and JOHN DOE, Kings County District Attorney (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
