Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,002
Doe v. Three Lower Counties Community Services Inc.
as 1:2023cv02811
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Three Lower Counties Community Services Inc., d/b/a Chesapeake Health Care and Three Lower Counties Community Services doing business as Chesapeake Health Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Connor v. Monster Reservations Group LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05082
Plaintiff: Jay Connor
Defendant: Monster Reservations Group LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Murphy v. Does 1-20
as 3:2023cv00606
Plaintiff: James A. Murphy
Defendant: John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Polidi v. Mendel et al
as 5:2023cv00518
Plaintiff: Richard Polidi
Defendant: Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
US v. John Doe
as 23-6920
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JOHN DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04606
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Connor v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv04360
Plaintiff: Jay Connor
Defendant: Scott Jones and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00713
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 8:2023cv02282
Plaintiff: Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant: Treymane Dameron, Kimberly Hobson, David Robinson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00387
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?