Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Francis v. Douglas County
as 8:2021cv00018
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Douglas County, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Correction Services et al
as 8:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Spence Propel, Dayna, Brandi and others
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Due v. Bataillon et al
as 8:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Richard G. Koph, Matthew R. Hoffman, Warden Werlich and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lim v. Doe #1 et al
as 8:2020cv00072
Defendant:
John Doe # 2 and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
John Dewey Lim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Recca v. Omaha Police Department et al
as 8:2019cv00207
Defendant:
Officer Nass, Omaha Police Department, Michael Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
James Michael Recca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Recca v. Omaha Police Department; Officers et al
as 8:2018cv00556
Defendant:
Omaha Police Department; Officers, Heidi Altic, Michael Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
James Michael Recca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. City Omaha Gang Unit et al
as 8:2018cv00110
Defendant:
City Omaha Gang Unit and John Doe Officer
Plaintiff:
Anwar Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentine v. One John Doe "CI" et al
as 8:2018cv00068
Defendant:
Officer Bivens, Officer Brown, John Doe Police and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica Valentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2018cv00030
Defendant:
City of Omaha, County of Douglas, State of Nebraska and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furby v. Lancaster County Jail, et al
as 8:2017cv00470
Plaintiff:
Clevone Jeremiah Furby
Defendant:
Lancaster County Jail and Unameded and Unknown Jane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
