Cases 1 - 10 of 1,318
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rivers v. Paulsen et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Denzel Samonta Rivers
Defendant:
Heather Paulsen, Steven Johnson, Bradley Everson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Fisher et al
as 2:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Dewhite D Johnson
Defendant:
Brandon Fisher, Matthew Burns, Joseph Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahajni v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Marwan Mahajni
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Deputy Vo Do, Deputy Scott Woida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keplin v. Doe #1-4
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Dennis Keplin
Defendant:
John Doe #1-4
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Hewlett v. Thomsen et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Damien Shontell Hewlett
Defendant:
Justin L Thomsen, Brandon Fischer, Tanner Leopole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility Security Staff et al
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Douglas T Murphy
Defendant:
Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility Security Staff, H Paulsen, Larita Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Marcus T Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
CO Green, Randall Hepp, CO Veguilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
